But reading Gianlucas sentence again ('wannabe developers that have no clue about where and how to ask for suggestions') I must say that I do not understand either what my reply could help with that, since I guess people with developing skills know IRC, bugtracker, ... so I do not understand the problem at all. Sorry for the confusion.
Is there currently enough developing manpower to further improve the project at a industrial pace? Have *all* *potential* external developers (btw, how many are they and how many of them really contribute to the project?) sufficiently knowledge about what help the *current* developers need?
If the answer is yes to both questions, the developing part of LibO is just perfect and we can delete any other mean of promotion for open dev tasks/bugs.
I think there is a mentality difference between us: you spoke about people that have *already* started working on the code while I speak about people that haven't started, yet. The former ones are looking for help to satisfy *their* own developing needs, the latter ones are looking for help to satisfy the needs of the project.
However, maybe, I'm completely missing the point in your message, because I suppose that *there are* developing needs of the project, based on a engineering-driven model for developing LibO.
Am I wrong? Regards, Gianluca --Lettura gratuita o acquisto di libri e racconti di fantascienza, fantasy, horror, noir, narrativa fantastica e tradizionale: http://www.letturefantastiche.com/
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted