Am Montag, den 14.02.2011, 21:10 -0500 schrieb Marc Paré:
I just wanted to add that regardless of banner used, most
users/visiter/members would check or assume that the banner is
clickable. I don't think it necessary to put a button on the banner to
re-direct people to a page with information on the reasons behind the
funding effort. People will just click on the banner.
This is a an assumption, right? :-) I know that the question is
"nitpicking", but why should people "check or assume" that the banner is
clickable? Why should they try?
The important thing here is, that (in this case) _we_ want them to get
active ... the current need for users to become involved is rather low.
So we have to lower the barriers in "clicking".
And it seemed to me that there have been some misunderstandings
concerning "clickable is button style", "target is tool tip", here is
some breakdown how it usually works from the conscious and sub-conscious
user's point-of-view (utility/usability perspective):
* Draw attention to the element/banner --> form, color, ...
* Get interest concerning its content --> text, graphics, ...
* Visualize that it is "active" (clickable) even _before_ users
have to spend effort by trying --> text, button layout, ...
(usability: "affordance" character)
* Make sure that people want to click and understand where the
journey goes to --> tell what to expect in the next step and
what they will gain, directly show URL
* Provide feedback if the action can be done --> usual mouseover
The more "critical" the case is, the more of these items need to be
respected. Maybe this is helpful for you to do some evaluation with
regard to the proposals.
This being the case, Bernhard's banner proposal would work well for
those interested in clicking on the banner.
Again, we have to make sure they are interested. Otherwise we loose
potential contributors / donations. Also tiny amounts help a lot ...
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy