Hi, 2011.01.25 21:54, Rimas Kudelis rašė:
2011.01.25 18:38, David Nelson rašė:On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 00:42, Charles-H. Schulz <email@example.com> wrote:We are aware of the decision by the Steering Committee, and are as well aware of the need for discernment, especially when it's about long time localizers who are supposed to know what they are doing... :-)But, Charles, perhaps that kind of peremptory action of undoing a contributor's work with no attempt whatsoever to discuss the matter in a rational manner should not be encouraged - not even from an SC member, if the project's governance is to have any credibility. Please may I ask that the page be left as I published it, to give others the chance to read the information and appreciate its merits, until the next SC meeting, at which time we could discuss the matter together?I've just read the current version of http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/localizers/ . It's perhaps a bit weird and vague (lots of talk, little info), but on the other hand, I think this page targets those who only want to become localizers, or maybe even have no idea what localization is. For those of us, who already are localizers, I think our wiki would be the right place to put (technical) info and seek for it.Disclamer: I haven't seen Sophie's version, so this opinion is probably a bit skewed.
I've just read Sophie's version of the page on http://pastie.org/1500466 . Basically, I think both pages convey the same ideas, but while I think Nelson's version has a bit more info, it allso seems to have a much lower signal/noise ratio. Indeed, I think that this particular page could be shortened at least twice, without losing much (any?) important information.
Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***