Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Somehow I feel the urge to put my 2 cents here, sorry...

On Wednesday 26 January 2011 16:00, Karl-Heinz Gödderz wrote:

Why can't both send their drafts to this list so we can decide as a
team, how to get the best of both?

Maybe it's not about the decision itself but about the process? Or even 
more subtile things? 

For me it sounds as it could be a personal problem or misunderstanding 
between S+D. 

But might also be intercultural habit or mentality differences? 

Or just years of hard experience in a very special OSS project vs. a 
very special working habit? 

Who knows? 

(But in this you are right, I'm also curious to see both versions.)

Anyway - for me, the outcome is quite clear: I "vote" for Sophie. She is 
the older (?) project member, so she is right by law of meritocracy.

Being assigned by SC does not supersede this. It can only be superseded 
by continuously delivering better value for the project, not by SC 
assignment of a temporary website dictator role ;)

Therefore I'd suggest that David takes a step back and leaves the 
content of the Localisation page to Sophie (fixing typos is ok, of 
course, but not more). 


(sorry again if stepping into personal issues - if unwanted, just ignore 
the post)

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.