Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:20 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-18 7:13 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I think that the main fault of everyone in this specific domain of the
web site (including SC members) was to overlook the web site problem and
leave it unmanaged.

I agree, although I would say *especially* the SC members... this is a
*management* problem, and I certainly hope they recognize and own it,
and take steps to *fix* it.

The first thing I would like to see is an *apology* to Michael and the
others for allowing them to *waste so much of their time* on a project
the SC was never going to endorse in the first place. Maybe I missed it,
but I don't recall anything even approaching such a thing.

And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance,
Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time.
Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as they saw what
was happening.

Again - I am dismayed at how this all transpired, and hope the SC and
the rest of the LibO *leaders* can learn from this huge (imo) mistake.

+1 to every word

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.