On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Christian Lohmaier
One of the bigger questionmarks comes with the "app-store" item -
similar with the themes - so this is kind of wishful thinking, as such
stuff doesn't exist yet, neither for OOo nor for LO
Most linux distributions have what is commonly known now as an 'app
store', you might know it as a deb or rpm repository.
MS is developing one for windows and Apple has announced the Mac app
store. I would expect that LibreOffice will feature on all of these
Also, themes do exist, in their current form they are
Tools->Options->Appearance and Tools->Options->View:Icon size and
style. But yes I hope they develop rapidly in the future.
But another thing that kind of irritates me is "Twitter support" - is
anyone doing this right now? Is it worth mentioning it? twitter is
kind of contrary to community-support (one asks a question, but all
benefit from the answer), with twitter my doubs are that it remains at
a personal level, only a small group of people have a benefit. similar
for facebook - I don't see how that would fit to support.
Twitter messages are a matter of public record. Think of twitter as a
message to everyone, replies to that message can also be tracked.
I have heard some people refer to it as IRC Next Gen, because you can
search for chat history very easily.
On facebook you can make a group public and everyone logged in can see
it, ie. http://www.facebook.com/libreoffice.org
And I'm also sceptical about the news - espl. "Community news editors
should be used to search for articles at least one per week." - I
don't think this is a good thing for a news-feed section. There should
be genuine news, not news harvested from other sources. A "press
coverage" section or similar would be more appropirate for this kind
of stuff, but then again I don't quite see the need for such a high
One key aspect of a community website is frequently updating the site
Major announcements such as new releases will feature prominently on
the landing page (/)
I like the idea of breaking up news into categories though.
The difference legal/licence is not really clear to me
Licence is the LGPL open source code licence that the LibreOffice
product is distributed under
wording "why not OOo" is suboptima, but of course I'm aware that is
just a concept, but talking bad about others should be prevented if
you can say the same thing in a more positive way, just did want to
I think we need to publicly address why we created LibreOffice as an
alternative to the massively popular and successful OOo.
A forum is never a robust form for discussion. Forums should be
avaoided at all cost. The medium for discussion are the mailinglists,
the place where results of those discussion, the outcome is preserved
is either the wiki or the real website (once it is available)
I don't want to user forums for discussion, they are just not
comfortable enough for this. (and if you say: You can setup
email-reminders/notfication and reply via mail, then I say: Then you
can use a mailinglist from the very beginning)
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. For infrequent conversation
participants a mailing list can be overwhelming and contain a lot of
info they do not care about, therefore information can be missed
Obviously a discussion that will have to be hashed out prior to any
kind of launch.
Thanks for all of your well considered feedback on the proposal.
I hope this has addressed some of your concerns about the proposal and
I would love to examine some specifications for other approaches.
E-mail to email@example.com for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy