Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Why don't all the OOo devs just come to TDF? I mean isn't this further
splitting up the community? What I want to see is a single powerful office
suite to kill Microsoft. I want to see them buried. I want to see a free,
open product that is perfect in it's seamlessness, transparency and ease of
use. I hope LO is the one to do it. We need to kick some ass!


On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, John B <johnb@email2.me> wrote:

Hi

As a disgruntled Lotus Smart Suite user, abandoned by IBM as are the Lotus
Amipro users, I am well aware of the link between Symphony & OOo, as one
reduced its support for LSS, so did the other one. In fact IBM have now
turned its back permanently on LSS and not so surprisingly in Windows so has
OOo;  with still thousands and thousands of requests (pleads) for IBM not to
do so (there is one request for compatibility - requested some 15,000
times). Whilst at the same time, LO increases its support - all praise to LO

I understand from reading the on-line guessing politics that IBM will at
some point bring out a Paid for version,  to link into Lotus Notes, so is
this the "Price" OOo have had to pay to get IBM's blue interface:-  the
"cost" of not being LSS compatible - Hold this space!

Beside, IBM's Symphony hardly stood as an "office suit" with only 3
programs - and it was far to buggy for me.

I am very happy for LO to stay on course.

regards

John B

------------------------------**------------------------------**
------------------------------**------------





On 17/07/2011 22:01, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
My emails are just my own opinion.  I'm not even a proper member yet!
Regards from
Tom :)




______________________________**__
From: Andy Brown<andy@the-martin-byrd.net**>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Sun, 17 July, 2011 20:23:30
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] IBM Donates Lotus Symphony Source Code to
the
Apache OpenOffice Project

Luuk wrote:

http://www-03.ibm.com/**software/lotus/symphony/buzz.**
nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&**unid=**955E9C0EC712EC47852578CD0063A2**
09&category=announcements<http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=955E9C0EC712EC47852578CD0063A209&category=announcements>
s

Is it time for the LO-developers to get back with OpenOffice too ?

 In a word, no.





--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
users+help@global.libreoffice.**org<users%2Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.
**org <postmaster@documentfoundation.org>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
List archive: 
http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/users/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/>
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.