Hi,
Based on suggestions (thank you), I conducted more experiments with
autocorrect and em-dash. I don't know if this is what's supposed to
happen. But this is what did happen.
1. typed a word
2. typed space
3 typed dash dash
4 typed space
5 typed a word
6 typed space
At 6 the previous dash dash was swapped for an em-dash, and this action
was repeatable. The replace did happen but at a word beyond where it had
been expected. Also, did not lose formatting. Upshot, the before and
after blanks seem important signalling tools for the algorithm. I
thought about it. Does make sense. I'm considering this yet another case
of expectations and reality not quite meeting in the middle.
--
Chris Johnson rchristopherjohnson@gmail.com
Ex SysAdmin, now, writer /Violence does, in truth, recoil upon the
violent, and the schemer falls into the pit which he digs for another../
(Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventures of Sherlock Homes)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.