On 3/25/2014 9:33 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
As a person who learned to type on a typewriter and learned
programming on a mainframe computer [since the PC did not exist at
that time], I have not learned how to do "styles". Never really
needed it, as far as I was concerned. Yes, yes, I should learn it,
but time to learn and play with styles is not an option for me currently.
Actually, Tim, we're not that different. I learned on an Underwood and
began using computers in the days of the Commodore 64 and MS-DOS (albeit
as a lawyer, not a programmer). I was a slow convert to Styles because,
like you, I was constantly seeking simplicity in my solutions.
I spent years perfecting my use of PC-Write. Then, my office switched to
Windows 3.1 and WordPerfect for Windows. Knowing the investment I had
made in PC-Write, I really didn't want to re-invest my time learning
another full-featured word processor. So, instead, I began using Windows
Write (the precursor to WordPad).
I loved it. It was the epitome of simplicity. No styles, no templates,
no "reveal codes" or complex menus and toolbars to complicate life. Just
a digital typewriter with True Type fonts. I was easily able to create
legal briefs and other documents. The program was limited to a single
file, so there was no bloat (other than the inherent bloat of Windows)
and it was free and immediately available on any computer with Windows.
Now, from a typographic standpoint, a legal brief is fairly simple. The
main text is double spaced with a first line indent (the tab key worked
nicely). Quoted matter is single-spaced and indented. Then, there are
section headings. I typically would have three levels of section
headings. They were boldface or italic type with either left or centered
alignment and with or without numbering. I always wanted to make sure my
headings stayed on the same page as the following paragraph as I didn't
want a heading by itself at the bottom of the page. My top level would
also typically start with a new page. I was able to accomplish all of
this with Write, using the K.I.S.S. method. It felt good not having to
wade through multiple layers of menus to find that one buried formatting
command. Of course, this meant I had to directly and manually format
each of my paragraphs and headings, making sure they were consistent,
with a page break before each top-level heading, and with none of my
headings landing at the bottom of the page.
After several legal briefs, I realized I was duplicating a lot of my
effort each time I wrote a brief not only within each brief, but from
one document to the next. And, sometimes, I failed in keeping my
headings consistent. Was that supposed to be 12-point bold, or 14-point
italic? It changed depending on the court I was in.
Then I discovered paragraph styles. After an initial time investment in
education, I have become a believer. Rather than manually formatting 7
to 10 section headings per brief, I have created three paragraph styles
controlling font, size, weight, alignment, and placement on the page. I
now apply many formatting characteristics with one mouse click. I no
longer *ever* type a tab key to indent a paragraph. I *know* my section
headings will be consistent and that page breaks will always appear
before my top level heading. And, then, by using styles for my headings,
I can easily and automatically generate a fully-formatted and numbered
table of contents with three mouse clicks, rather than typing the whole
thing manually. Yes, it took time to create my styles, but the time
saved in my actual work is not insignificant.
It is certainly simpler to insert a section heading with a single mouse
click on "Heading 1" than it is to hit <ctrl-enter> for a page break,
then <ctrl-e> to center the paragraph, then <ctrl-b> to make it bold,
and then click on the point size to increase it, and then after typing
my heading, hit <ctrl-b> to turn off my boldface, <ctrl-l> to left align
the next paragraph and click on the point size to decrease it, and do
this each and every time I insert a heading hoping I don't make a
mistake. Just describing it is exhausting.
So, yes, if you prefer the typewriter method, by all means use it. I
would never try to force styles on you. But, I hope you don't consider
my attempts at styles evangelism to be "forcing." Just trying to point
out that the K.I.S.S. method may seem simpler to those of us who learned
our craft on the typewriter, but in the long run, it does result in more
work and less consistent results.
Virgil
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Tom Davies
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Steve Edmonds
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Felmon Davis
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Doug Essinger-Hileman
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Jean-Francois Nifenecker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Steve Edmonds
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Wolfgang Keller
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Tom Davies
Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Document · Brian Barker
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.