Hi :)
I wish MS had got that memo! Sadly that seems to be the opposite of
MS's view. So people have learned to;
1. need to keep a print-out as "hard copy"
2. assume every document to be unsable in 3 years time
3. fight hard against any change or upgrade because they know it will
break their system and make everything unreadable.
4. hate and mistrust IT because it's so unreliable and unpredictable
Hopefully we can help free people themselves from the mess they are in
but most times it's better to just sit back and feel smug, or even
laugh at them as they struggle on with things that LibreOffice,
OpenOffice, Caligra, AbiWord (and all the rest) make really simple and
reliable.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 26 March 2014 15:31, Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net> wrote:
Perhaps, we could get folks past the Underwood model if office suites
stopped offering that as a legitimate option for creating typeset
documents.
*Proper* document processing software should indeed *enforce* total
separation of structure(d content) and style information through
*exclusive*, *mandatory* use of stylesheets.
And thus prevent people from producing un-reuseable spaghetti garbage.
Because that's what IT is about in the first place: Making content
easily re-usable.
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Doug Essinger-Hileman
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Jean-Francois Nifenecker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Brian Barker
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Steve Edmonds
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Wolfgang Keller
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Documents, Office Suites, and the Underwood · Tom Davies
Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Document · Brian Barker
Re: [libreoffice-users] Master Document · Dale Erwin
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.