Peter West wrote:
or quietly being given, a copy of an employer's software meant that MS Office products gained
near-ubiquity.
Assuming the organization is not SoHo sized, or smaller, unless the person negotiating with
Microsoft for licenses is a complete idiot, the license will allow for each employee to install
MSO on their home computer, for the duration of their employment, or the corporate license expires,
whichever comes first.
demands to provide documents in MS Word format when providing a CV.
The first software to scan resumes did so with plain text. HR personel are too incompetent with
computer software, to know how to convert a file in any non-plain text file format to plain text,
so the companies added import in MS Word DOc, as an option. They also provided the ability to
import several other word processing formats. But since HR doesn't understand that the software has
that ability, they don't accept resumes in other formats.
former MS executives will reveal that theft was a vital element in MS' strategy for their Office
products during the world colonisation phase.
Bill Gates is on record that corporate piracy was, and is, vital to their efforts to prevent
competitors from even gaining a toehold.
Ballmer is on record on saying that the company has to walk a fine line in combating piracy. Whilst
short term revenue is always increased when the piracy crackdown happens, the long term revenue
stream is less clear, and that some companies and organizations have made it decidely more
difficult for Microsoft to collect any money from them.
jonathon
--
Sent from the eating establishment at the far side of the universe, at the begining of time.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · Don Myers
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · John Kennedy
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · M. Fioretti
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · James Knott
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · Virgil Arrington
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · James Knott
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · Tom Davies
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.