On 11/29/2013 07:20 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
James wrote in response to John:
I didn't know we considered trialware "cunning".
They let people create & edit documents for a while and then hold them
hostage, until the users coughs up for MS Office.
I wouldn't consider it either cunning or holding people hostage to
provide them with a free trial of software that is otherwise only
available for a price. That, indeed, has been the essence of shareware
-- try before you buy. Anybody obtaining a trial version of MS-Office
is clearly told that it is a trial version; no cunning, no deception.
If you don't like it, don't buy it.
The creators of the shareware concept (I recall Bob Wallace of the
PC-Write days) realized that buying software is often a crap-shoot.
You don't know until after you've bought the program whether it will
do what you need, or whether you will appreciate the manner in which
it does it. This is especially important in the case of an office
suite as users will tend to use them on a daily basis, eventually
becoming married to their program. MS allows some users to try their
program before making such a commitment.
For my part, on my last computer purchase, I received a free "starter"
version of MS-Office, with some limitations on features, but without
any limitation on time. I can use the starter version forever.
I'm no fan of MS, and I'm sure I don't fully understand all of its
business practices, but I truly hope that disdain for Redmond is not
the primary motivation for LO and other forms of FOSS. And, yet, it's
a theme that recurs on nearly every FOSS related forum I read.
IMHO, it's better to focus on what's good about LO than what's evil
About 13 years ago I started doing some website work. I used Microsoft
Frontpage. I had no feelings about Microsoft one way or another. I
figured if I was doing some website work, I should get some tech
e-mails. That is where I started learning about Microsoft. Some of the
things they've done are listed here, in a report to the European Commission:
Think about the number of companies they have put out of business, not
because of superior Microsoft products, but because of greed and
unethical practices. Think of the employees of those companies who lost
their jobs. Look at the companies Microsoft has partnered with through
the years. Most of them have gone broke. Look at their promise to have
their formats be open standards. How many years ago was that promise?
Are they trying to make it happen? Look at the way they were bribing
people to get the ISO approval. I could go on all night.
I didn't wake up one morning and decide I'm not going to like Microsoft.
My feelings towards them developed over a period of years. The tactics
they used in the past they are still trying to use today. I try to be an
honest, ethical person. I prefer to do business with honest, ethical
companies, and support honest, ethical folks like The Document Foundation.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · Don Myers
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · John Kennedy
Re: Cost of MS Office relative to LO, was: Fwd: [libreoffice-users] Re: moving to new version of MS Office · M. Fioretti
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy