On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 15:20:49 PM -0500, Jay Lozier wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
There are two different "topics" here.
1 - Open File Formats - ODF
2 - Free and Open Source Software office suites - LO and OOo/AOO
that is true. But if you don't understand why and how they are deeply
interrelated, and how promoting the first is the most effective thing
you may do to promote the second, please re-read again what Jay wrote:
I think promoting ODF formats which are ISO standards for all office
documents "levels the playing field". It does not matter as pointed out
above what program is used by the user to create or edit a file. Then
all packages are truly competing on features/benefits/costs continuum
not on the ability to properly parse a specific proprietary format.
Also, using ODF formats avoids the tweaking MS apparently does with
their formats with each new release.
Thanks Jay, well said.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Shall we waste twelve more years promoting Free office suites instead of... (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy