Jay Lozier wrote
Also, using ODF formats avoids the tweaking MS apparently does with their formats with each new release.
I disagree. ODF has the same problem. That is why LO has an option to save in ODF 1.0/1.1 or 1.2 and even 1.2 extended. ODF has EXACTLY the same problem that accuses DOCX of: even if the file extension is the same, the contents varies according to the office version you used to save it. The ONLY difference is that you can always get the latest fully compatible version of LO for free, unlike MS Office which requires that you to buy the latest office version to have access to the full features of the updated file format. I'm sorry to break this idealism about ODF's perfection... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-Free-office-suites-instead-of-tp4082259p4082290.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted