Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

mariosv wrote
I love to waste my time as I please. And as I know this is an open
project, everyone is free to take their choice about this thread as he/she
likes, so I would pleased not being told about what must be my choice.


mariosv wrote
On the last months there is in development a deep work in the calc core,
to get a better performance and set up the basics for further
improvements. What I think will bring more benefits on the performance
than a 64 bits version.

So maybe we should have some patience, leaving the steps going on their
own time.

I know and I agree, Miguel. I just don't agree with the logic "don't ask for
a 64bit version because it's very time consuming and expensive and you don't
need it anyway". 

Why do Linux and Mac people need it more than Windows people? Do they work
with files larger than 4Gb? Isn't the cost per developer hour the same? If
there is no advantage why do developers bother at all? 

View this message in context:
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.