[libreoffice-users] Re: 64 bit

Hola Miguel Ángel, all


mariosv wrote
> So that's not my logic.

Yes, I understood your position. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear.


mariosv wrote
> My perception of reading here and there, it is not only compile with a 64
> bits tool matter, but a large code adaptation. I think in some
> applications like spreadsheets could be much more appreciated the parallel
> calculation with several cores. 
>
> Maybe someone with experience in Linux can bring a bit of light about if
> there is an appreciable difference between 32 versus 64 bits.

I have no doubt that parallel calculation with several cores and any other
optimization as those being added by Kohei are much more important.

I was simply replying to people in this thread that said there was no point
in having a 64bit build because the only benefit is for files larger than
4Gb. 

If there is no benefit why are the LO Devs "wasting" their time creating a
64bit Mac version?

And why did they create a 64bit version for Linux? Just because it is so
easy?

Reagrds,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/64-bit-tp4081444p4082215.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted