Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


jmadero wrote
No offense at all, I encourage open conversation but I tend to see a one 
side conversation "THERE SHOULD BE A 64 BIT FLYING LIBREOFFICE THAT CAN 
BAKE ME A CAKE AND CALCULATE A QUADRILLION FORMULAS IN 0.0000001 SECONDS 
USING ALL 16 OF MY CORES!" - without the other side of the equation - 
"such a product would be incredibly costly and there are thousands of 
much more important things to get done that will benefit a lot more
users."

So, having a 64bit Linux version is Ok, creating a 64bit version for MacOS
(starting in LO 4.2) is Ok, but asking for a 64bit Windows build is
selfish... 

Interesting. Us Windows users should be ashamed of ourselves...



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/64-bit-tp4081444p4082136.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.