From: Ken Springer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2013, 21:43
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: CNET is claiming the best free MSO alternative is not LO
On 6/9/13 2:07 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
There could be a core group of Extensions/Add-ons that are maintained as part of the program.
Official add-ons. Then a bunch of 3rd party or experimental ones. Encourage all to be made as
OpenSource so that if/when the original maintainer vanishes then others could take over.
This assumes there will be someone interested in taking the extensions over.
If you were at 3rd party developer, how would you feel about competing
with "official" add-ons, especially if the one you wrote was superior?
If it's not official, maybe there's something wrong with it.
Mac OS X 10.8.4
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy