A thing about FOSS that is good, is that there is more than one voice
involved in the way the product will be designed/used/etc.. MS people
tend to say - This is what you are going to use now and this is how your
will do it. Products involved with many companies helping with the
development, listens to more than one voice to make the decisions in how
to use the product, what it can do, and what it will be like for the
user experience.
MS will not likely stop being a big company and provide the products and
services they feel the market needs. For a FOSS package, it is good to
have a large base of volunteers and companies that provide development
of the product. Sure, with everything in the hands of one company and
its highly stressed development teams under the control of one manager
[that may be just a professional manager] - could be a good thing for a
product. But is that better for the user or just better for the
company's product manager? MS has in the past shown that they are not
in sync with its users, and has done so many times. With the FOSS
model, it is hard not to include the user of the package in its
development process. Volunteers tend not to want to work on a product
that the users will not want to use. MS makes a package and tell the
users - here it is so use it the way we tell you to use it.
The article was written the first week of November, and I think I have
read it before.
I think packages that cares about the user, like LibreOffice does, will
be successful and gain market shares from the products that do not
include the users in development of the product, like MS does..
On 11/25/2012 11:38 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
It's interesting that there has been almost no posts about articles such as this one.
https://www.linux.com/news/software/applications/660608-libreoffice-a-continuing-tale-of-foss-success
There are some interesting stats that are very well presented in there and it's worth using to
spread the word of how LibreOffice works.
For me one of the key things that no article seems to mention is that while many hefty companies
are vanishing seemingly overnight it seems somewhat dangerous to rely on just one. It would be
like not making back-ups of critical information!! If we can bear to think of LO and AOO as being
similar enough that users can migrate from one to the other fairly easily and thus as being 2
prioducts supported by 1 community then that community is massive. Taken as being 1 product it is
so robust that even if 1 or 2 companoes the size of IBM or Google (or RedHat or SUSE) were to
simply vanish overnight then there would still be a good product out there. By sticking with MS
people are risking everything they have by being so heavily dependant on just 1 company and that
company is losing market share to mobile devices. Perhaps Win8 might help them recover the OS
battle but it might not.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: "fridolin@kathan.co.nz" <fridolin@kathan.co.nz>
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Sunday, 4 November 2012, 8:07
Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Good Article for LibreOffice
A positive & informative article about LibreOffice.
https://www.linux.com/news/software/applications/660608-libreoffice-a-continuing-tale-of-foss-success
Greetings from Tauranga
Fridolin
--Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.