and I agree with the way you think :-)
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Dr. R. O Stapf
I did not want to express it that explicitly.... what you wrote is
I am often wondering why some members of this forum complain so much about
LO instead of exchanging information in non-inflicting-feelings-of-others
words, which help other users to solve their problems and/or help to move
LO's development forward.
On 15.10.2012 07:48, anne-ology wrote:
MSFT does not list their bugs; they deny them ;-(
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Dr. R. O Stapf <
I have my still my doubts on graphics, but all the other remarks of Tom I
By the way is there a list of MSO bugs we can have a look at? I doubt!
On 14.10.2012 10:39, anne-ology wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Tom Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I prefer LO on Windows even though i have a choice of MSO 2007 and 2010
the same machine. All 3 installed but LO handles graphics better.
doesn't keep changing styles, languages, indentations, size of
bullet-points and it keeps track of numbers better in numbered lists.
better compatibility. Each version of MSO stuffs up documents created
the other. If i write in LO then save as doc then both versions of MSO
display the file the same way. I find the menus easier although some
things are just as easy on both.
From: Andreas Säger <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, 11 October 2012, 23:48
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice in MacWorld Australia
Am 11.10.2012 20:46, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
It is nice to see that MacWorld Australia states that LibreOffice is a
"must have" app/package. I wonder if the MacWorld for the USA and
would have the same statement.
Be nice to have LO listed in the "must have" category in the various
Windows magazines. We could use more Windows users, and free
advertisements towards Windows users, as we can get.
It would be nice to have a booth in a Windows version of the big
software shows that happen for Linux and Mac. But those booths may be
very expensive to "rent" for such an event.
Windows users can run MS Office easily and for little money (if any).
Why should they use LibreOffice if all they want is cheap MS Office?
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy