On 10/11/2012 06:48 PM, Andreas Säger wrote:
I do not know about you, but LO is free and MSO is not. Then there is
the bloatedness of MSO that was giving me problems with MSO2003, now it
is even worse, as I have been told. LO is a good FREE alternative to
buying MSO. I know a lot of people that cannot afford to spend good
money on software they use for other things.
Am 11.10.2012 20:46, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
It is nice to see that MacWorld Australia states that LibreOffice is a
"must have" app/package. I wonder if the MacWorld for the USA and Europe
would have the same statement.
Be nice to have LO listed in the "must have" category in the various
Windows magazines. We could use more Windows users, and free
advertisements towards Windows users, as we can get.
It would be nice to have a booth in a Windows version of the big
software shows that happen for Linux and Mac. But those booths may be
very expensive to "rent" for such an event.
Windows users can run MS Office easily and for little money (if any).
Why should they use LibreOffice if all they want is cheap MS Office?
I know of many people who choose MSO and the fee, since they did not
know there was any package that they could use instead of MSO. If given
a choice, they now would have never paid the MSO fee and just installed
We need to get the word out to Windows users about how good LO is. Then
there are those people who have to deal with several computers in their
household or small business. How about the free community computer
centers? How many of those places can afford 5, 10, 15, etc., licenses
of MSO when the money is not there, or is needed to keep the computers
Then there are all of the free language spell checking dictionaries and
free language packs. How much would it cost a person to have a version
of MSO that is uses English, Spanish - Puerto Rico version, French, and
Hebrew, menus and spelling dictionaries? I once talked to a lady from
Israel that needed to deal with English, French, and Hebrew, for her
tourism center she worked for. She was amazed that one package could do
what she could not get MSO to do for her.
How many of LO's user could use the price to buy a full version of
MSO-2010 for something else? I do not know where you will find a legal
copy of MSO for no cost, so your "if any" comment is not valid. The
last price I found for a version of MSO I would use was going to cost me
more that it cost me for my new 23 inch monitor I needed, or the cost of
the internal 2-TB drive I needed to replace a dead drive.
As a person with a fixed income, I cannot afford to pay MS for their
office package when I can get LO for free. I know a lot of people that
feel the same way.
LO is not "a cheap MSO". It is a free alternative to MSO and is a FOSS
package. There are a lot of European governments, and other governments
in the world that are no using a FOSS office package instead of MSO.
Our USA federal governmental leaders are now looking at FOSS as a
solution to their software needs. A mandate for "The White House" is
for looking into FOSS for their software needs before looking at buying
something. The need to reduce the budget is just one reason to look at
packages like LO.
SO, it is not "Idealism" or "Masochism" in looking towards LO for the
office package in a Windows environment. Of course, there are those who
rather see MS do everything their way and make sure people pay them for
all their computer needs. I do not want to give MS more control of my
life and my computers as they are doing their best to force people to
do, if they want to use a computer.
I an a Linux person. I still have a couple of Windows systems, but
rarely use them. On those Windows systems, other than the OS, I rarely
use any products that came from MS. I prefer FOSS. I prefer to go
legally free software over paying for some package that I can find/use a
good, or better, free one that does the same/similar job.
MS is even trying to claim that they own the rights to a huge chunk of
the Linux core code to get people to pay them to use distros like
Ubuntu, Linux Mint, even Red Hat, to avoid the "threat" of MS taking
that business to court and doing everything to drag out the case till
the small company [and larger ones as well] folds due to running out of
money to pay the court costs in the fight for what is right. a few
million in court costs is pocket change to MS, but not the small/medium
business owners. Now who would be eager to give MS more of their money,
with that type of business model/attitude towards people they want as
customers? Give us money we legally have no right to, or we will take
you to court and ruin your business with the legal fees and court costs
defending your legal rights.
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy