Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi :)
Just had a classic from my boss.  He says he prefers Internet Explorer and Adobe because he's never 
had any trouble with them.  He can't download  Pdfs though and has the same problem at home.  
Firefox on his machine here downloads them fine.  When Foxit is set as the default Pdf reader then 
IE does download.  

Going to showed 26 important security updates that didn't get installed through his 
auto-updates.  None were about adding functionality. Then java and different things needed to be 
updated separately.  The only updates (well upgrades really) that added functionality were for 
Firefox and LibreOffice. 

His Internet Explorer is still grumbling about some C++ problem in iexplorer.exe whenever he tries 
to download pdfs.  He still says there is no problem with IE.  

Regards from
Tom :)  

<snip />

Hi Tom,
Thank you for a very informative answer - it is bad that all this
      is not mentioned as a basic info about LibO.
I am prepared to trust it as true but honestly I have to rely on
      my own experiences both regarding Win/MSO and LibO.

I have been using Windows and many of MS programs since early
      1980:  all of the modules in the MSO suite, Access, Publisher,
      Visio, Project, etc
    never any problems with installing
    never need to send any kind of bug reports
    never any need to contact any community/list for help
   cannot remember not one machine crash when using
    no courses, no teachers in using Windows/MS programs
      -- I had no problems to learn all by my self mostly thanks to a
      good help function;  when I was working as IT-help/help desk I
      could even tutor my colleagues in Word, Excel, PP, Access how to
      use the special features and functions
    made a lot of Access-dbs, learned to complete them
      with VBA and got macros work 

Some facts about LibO (first 3.4.5, then 3.4.6 -- I didn't dare to install later versions, so now 
back to OO)
    in January this year after downloading LibO I had big
      problems/crashes with getting Base ("similar" to MSAccess) working
      - reason: JRE and bad guidings
    some basic features/functions in Base does not work --
      no help from "LibO help" nor "Base Guide"
    I have some rather big (heavy) applications in Calc
      (several sheets, 200 rows&15-30 cols/sheet, remote referenses
      between sheets) - I've noticed (when tracking why results are
      wrong) that Calc in some situations does not have "power" enough
      to do the automatic recalc through all the rows/cols/pages: there
      is nothing wrong, it just does not do the recalc -- which means
      that I cannot trust the calcs to be 100% correct;  this is not
      only inconvenient but can be fatal in economical calcs   (my
      computers do most certainly have all the power needed)
    the button "LibreOffice Help" does not directly lead
      to any kind of help -- the function is totally of no use until you
      first learn it's logic (if any) -- to find any help can take hours
      of digging

I should very much like to use LibO only (not only because of
      costs) but cannot afford wasting time and nerves on all the
According to this list there are -- in my opinion -- too many
      others having problems already from the very beginning, with

For me -- I represent the ordinary non-LibO-expert user -- it is
      obvious why not only companies rely on Windows/MSO.
I can not see that this is anything to argue about: LibO must be
      easy-to-use, stable and free from any basic problems if it wants
      to be really accepted.
Note: I am talking about ordinary people and ordinary companies,
      who value their time.  

<snip />

On 27.9.2012 17:07, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
On the contrary. MS do not fix their problems quickly at all. 
        Even known malware threats remain for months and even years. 
        Their strategy is to blame the users.  A typical one being to
        tell users they shouldn't be using macros because of the
        likelihood of getting an infected or corrupted one.  Read "The
        Emperor’s New Clothes".  People are told that MS Office is the
        best and so when they find problems with it they tend to blame
        themselves rather than the software.  

For example when using non-MS software someone would quite
        happily slate the product with this sort of thing "I opened my
        document and deleted tons of stuff and saved it using the same
        name.  now when i open the document it has all that stuff
        missing!  The stupid program can't even find the stuff that i
        deleted.  No, of course i don't have a back-up of the file
        before my deletions"

One problem that has never been solved is that when creating an
        MS document the style keeps randomly changing without the user
        doing anything noticeable.  So, the language keeps switching to
        US.  Bullet-points and numbering styles keep changing.  So in a
        bulleted list the points keep changing shape, size and amount
        they are indented by.  Numbered lists may well miss a few
        numbers or repeat a few or suddenly change from i), ii) to c),
        d) or other weirdness.  

People have learned to accept all this shoddiness from Word
        because it happens to so many people.  Really advanced users
        have learned to re-impose formatting after completing a document
        or just accept it.  

Spelling has gone out the window not just because of the MTV
        generation but also because MS's spell-checker keeps switching
        languages back into American (US) so things that are correct are
        sometimes given a red-wriggle and sometimes blatantly incorrect
        spellings are not found.  

LibreOffice tends to stick to the same style throughout, unless
        the user has deliberately changed styles and is aware of having
        done so.  So, bullet-points line-up and retain the same size. 
        Likewise with numbered lists.  

Another problem is the way Word can't handle images with much
        sophistication.  MS produce a different product for people to
        buy.  Publisher.  Most of the functionality of publisher
        wouldn't be needed if Word wasn't such a Pos.  Writer handles
        most things that Publisher does with more elegance and

Another problem is the limited choices when exporting to Pdf.  I
        often get posters and stuff from Word users that probably looked
        quite good at their end but the jpg compression has made a mad
        swirly mess of it.  LibreOffice allows you to set the type of
        compression and even allows people to create uncompressed Pdfs. 
        Pdfs can be created with various levels of integration with
        screen-readers for blind-users.  MS Word has limited options.  

So, LO already is a far better product in many, many ways but
        people have learned to accept problems with MS stuff and are
        even happy when their machine is heavily infected with malware
        that results from using MS junk.  

Just my opinion and doubtless many people, especially the BoD
Regards from
Tom :)

<snip />

All the best LibO folks,
This discussion about calendars etc. may be interesting
                perhaps also useful -- but back to the basic question!  Microsoft is going to 
change their behavior.

Let us remember that MS is the absolute market leader --
                they can't be totally wrong when having 95% and people
                accept paying.
It is no use blaming MS for success -- it is only waste
                of energy and expresses your foolishness.  LibO only
                have to accept it.

Whether you like it or not MS's programs use to work
                without remarkable problems - and if such happens MS
                fixes them rather quickly.
That is why people and especially companies seem to be
                prepaired to pay what ever the cost.

What I have tried to say is that if LibO wants to get a
                reasonable share oh this cake -- free of charge or not
                -- then LibO must offer and also deliver something
                better than the MS's Office suit it's Access included --
                equal is far away from enough.

Some of you said that ordinary users -- and even more
                experienced - seldom use more than a 2-5%  of the LibO's
                (MSO's) features.
Why not then identify the 30% of all most used features
                and make sure that at least these work properly -- Base

If LibO cannot be made at least as stable, free of bugs
                and easy to use -- and especially it's help function
                understandable for every new user -- then there is no
                larger future for LibO except for a small group of
                idealists and enthusiasts in their own little
I see this as a question of defining priorities - and a
If the goal seems clear and clever then then the
                resources will at least not disappear.

<snip />

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.