Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 24/09/2012 at 16:48, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P" <webmaster@krackedpress.com> 
wrote:

 We need to keep it with the 
needed options for the 90% "average" users and not for those that are in 
the last 10% or even those in the last 1% or less users that do so 
complex work that the "average" user could not figure out why this is 
being done or even how to do such a thing even with the needed 
documentation.

I totally disagree.

If user is unable to do something he wants with open documentation, then this 
is documentation fault. It should be fixed (made clear, verbose, use 
screenshots or anything), not feature should be disabled.

There are many ways to speed up opening of programs. Some features may be 
delayed or loaded on request. Application can be modularized - core features 
are loaded by default, other are loaded only if user wants them (take a look 
at LaTeX, GNU R, Miranda (instant messenger), even Mozilla Firefox to some 
avail).

*Removing* features is total no-go, because it will drive away these users who 
need them. And I don't think that LO is application only for 90% of it's 
current users.
-- 
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.