Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Thank you for the link, Thorsten (I can't CC you because Nabble doesn't allow
that)


Thorsten Behrens wrote:

LibO is, like OOo, an extended conformance producer/consumer of
ODF1.2, in its default setup. Choosing ODF format version 1.2 in
Tools->Options->Load/Save->General makes it produce "conforming ODF
documents" as per 22.2.1.


I think most users are aware of that. The funny (??) part is NONE of the ODF
documents I ever created with LO is a valid ODF 1.2 document. It makes me
wonder what was the point of making it a Standard and requesting ISO
compliance if not even LO follows the rules...

Just a thought...

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OASIS-Standard-ODF-1-2-Approved-tp3384139p3396410.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.