Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

Tom <tomdavies04 -AT- yahoo.co.uk>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:21:31 -0700 (PDT)

Hi :) We are making a big fuss about very trivial differences. The OpenDocument Format does allow for some leeway so that the various programs that implement ODF can read documents that are not fully compliant. Each program that implements ODF 1.2 has it's own tiny quirks and each other programs should be able to cope with slight deviations. Almost no-one and almost nothing is perfect. It's something to aspire to and work towards but we have to have something workable to actually use as we approach that. Regards from Tom :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OASIS-Standard-ODF-1-2-Approved-tp3384139p3397031.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.