Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

Pedro <pedlino -AT- gmail.com>

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:43:27 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Tom Tom wrote:


We are making a big fuss about very trivial differences.

How do you know they are trivial? In the document I referred previously in this topic, after conversion to ODF, which took me a few hours, opening in Abiword 2.9.1 or Textmaker 2012 (Beta) is useless. The only other program where the file looks _similar_ is in IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0 So I'm not talking about trivialities... And this is a small 51 page report... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OASIS-Standard-ODF-1-2-Approved-tp3384139p3397315.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.