Hi :)
Yes, but it's very rare for a program to be 100% perfect. Thigns tend to be reasonably close but
just not close enough sometimes. Of course with proprietary stuff it is usually difficult to get
any bugs fixed but with OpenSource it's possible for 'anyone' to fix a bug.
There are a lot of bug-reports about specific problems with MS formats and the list is getting
worked through. Usually the older formats (without the X at the end, eg doc rather than docx) work
better because there has been longer to fix the bugs.
LibreOffice doesn't completely conform to ODF standards either but it is trying to get closer.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 11/9/11, Anthony Papillion <anthony@cryptofreaks.tk> wrote:
From: Anthony Papillion <anthony@cryptofreaks.tk>
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Should LibreOffice even support Microsoft secret formats?
To: "LibreOffice Mailing List" <users@global.libreoffice.org>
Date: Sunday, 11 September, 2011, 21:41
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:33:09 +0100
From: tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk
Hi :)
MS don't implement their standard in the way that they wrote they would. Having set a standard
anyone that follows that standard is guaranteed to produce things that are a little wonky when
opened in MS Office. LO devs work at getting LO's implementation as wonky as MS's but the
wonkiness is the unknown factor.
Hi Tom,
Ok, I can accept that. But then, aren't we back to a 'secret format'? If I implement a standard to
write out a file a certain way and do it in another way that isn't documented then I'm not
following the standard and, thus, my filetype is secret. The only way it's *not* secret is if they
file is written to the standard without any deviations.
At first, I thought 'ok, so this means MS has published a standard that other vendors can write to
and MS will has implemented that standard (in addition to their secret one) so that MSO can always
properly read other vendor created MSO files". But that's not the case. There are times, it seems,
when LibO files are improperly rendered in MSO.
So, apparently, the 'standard' really doesn't mean anything because that's not really what
Microsoft is doing.
Anthony
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] Should LibreOffice even support Microsoft secret formats? · Gordon Burgess-Parker
RE: [libreoffice-users] Should LibreOffice even support Microsoft secret formats? · Dennis E. Hamilton
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.