Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 2011-09-08, Tanstaafl wrote:

What the heck was that???

(top-posted because there is no way to make sense of the quoted text)

I... guess it was some serious Thunderbird misconfiguration? Or maybe
it's written in Quenya...

(replied exactly below the question it's supposed to address, just like
interleaved style should be used) 

On 2011-09-07 9:53 PM, Keith Bates <keith@new-life.org.au> wrote:
On 08/09/11 11:29, Don Myers wrote:Reply
      below:On 09/07/2011 08:02 PM, NoOp wrote:For those that continue to insist on top
        posting on the LO lists: pleaseconsider bottom posting with interspersed replies.Hi 
All,I will respect your wishes about posting at the bottom. I live in
      the US. I do a lot of work e-mails in my job, and receive a lot of
      work e-mails. I never receive any e-mails where people reply to me
      at the bottom. The reply is always at the top. I never understood
      why Thunderbird had the default to reply at the bottom when
      Thunderbird came out. It was backwards!!!!!! So I have always
      changed the default on every system I've installed it on. Maybe
      there are different customs in different countries.DonIt's not a point about national 
customs. It's about the way we read
    mailing lists.If you are in a one-to-one conversation then you will know the
    context of the conversation and more importantly you will remember
    what you said to that person last time.In that case top posting
    works often,although you may still have to re-quote parts of the
    previous conversation to make it clear what is being talked about or
    the points you are responding to.In a mailing list where there are multiple conversations 
frommultiple people all happening simultaneously, it is a lot easier for
    all concerned if replies are interspersed in the body of the
    previous email or at the bottom so that new readers can pick up the
    context of the conversation. Also for people who come across the
    archived version looking to solve a problem several months later, it
    is much easier if you can follow the logical flow by scrolling down
    through the various discussions.We've had this discussion multiple times on this and 
previously on
    the OO list.I'm with NoOp on this but I know that there are people who insist on
    their right to top post.-- 

-- 
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.