John,
You've written two posts by hitting "Reply to:" on another email that's about another subject
(About the Delete Key on OS X). While that's an easy way to make sure you get the list address
without typing it in, it means your new posts, on totally different topics, are rolled up into this
thread about the Delete Key.
That creates a few problems: 1) Those dealing with the thread on Delete Keys are frustrated because
that discussion is now taken over by two other topics and it's harder to follow the discussion, and
2) People that are potentially interested in your topics have a good chance of never seeing them
because they're folded up in a topic about Delete Keys and OS X. People that may have answers to
your questions may never see your posts because they'll be filed under the other topic, so they may
see that topic, decide it doesn't apply to them, and delete the entire thread, including your posts.
You can avoid this by not starting new threads by using the "Reply to:" function and just changing
the title -- email programs look at data other than the subject to determine topic threads.
Hal
On Jul 3, 2011, at 11:10 AM, John B wrote:
Eagerly awaited - for a LO working mail merge from the newly released 3.4.1
Before I did this test, I completely cleaned 3.3.3 using revo-uninstaller to ensure a completely
new install.
The 1st thing I did was to view existing mail merge data files from 3.3.3 - they were still all
screwed up as before. I therefore deleted them, so at to not cause further confusion and start
again from new. However, I could not find a way of deleting the old files from the internal list
(there is no remove button), once I looked at them.
I started from fresh, I created a standard 2 name data base for Mr Smith & Mr Blogs.
I did this with ease. Now when the MM came to the part that places the data on the letter (6.
Edit Document), a few strange things happened, the address line 2, the County and Company names
were not present, the post code came before the town name and the title "Mr" is on a separate
line to his name.
This is where you have a learn a new "game" called shuffle and add the field names. So you go
back to "3. Insert Address Block", go into edit mode and play with the arrows and create a
standard address pattern (which you would have thought would be the default). I considered that
this could this be deliberate (because they are so bad) - so as to force you to look and make
your own? However, you will only have to do this once, as LO remembers this layout for the next
time.
Then Create Salutation (tick the boxes), >Adjust layout (I did not use this), > then Edit document
In Edit Document the Field Names are deposited on your letter for the 1st time, the next thing
you notice is the weird Spacing between the address lines, you cannot adjust this in the document
directly (its frozen), so you have to go to the Edit Document's:- "Edit Document" > (right
click)> Edit Paragraph style> indents & spacing > Below Paragraph > set to 0.00cm - This puts it
back to the letter default.
Then Personalise Document (this prints all your letters) - this is where you now can see
(WYSIWYG) for the 1st time, the full document that will be printed and you realise that there are
no spaces or comma's between the fields hence the 1st line looks like MrJohnSmith.
To resolve this, you have to go back to Edit Document to put in spaces (and comma's). I could
find no way of doing this at making / inserting address block stage, so you will always need to
do this on each new mail merge.
I saved and Exited
I then realised that there were no name(s) after the salutation Dear ......, so I went back and
tried unsuccessfully to insert it again, the moment you go from Edit Document (where the Dear Mr
Smith exists) to Personalise Document, it disappears ( a Bug me thinks). As a work around, whilst
in Edit mode, I copied & pasted the name, this (the name) stayed when I went on to Personalise
Document (annoying but it worked). So I would suggest don't use "Create Salutation, make your
own, by copying & pasting from the main Address block.
Also, on testing, other previously known bugs:-
As long as you do not click the "Insert address block" on the 2nd time around (leave it greyed
out), then it does not insert a 2nd address block AND the links stay in place.
Having exited again, I then edited the data base file (*.csv) by adding a new name (a 3rd name in
my case), in the spread sheet format *.csv (it takes a while to find this file and remember to
read it in "tab" format). Re- started the mail merge - and it Worked!! - 3 names. So names &
addresses can now be entered with ease and without having to open mail merge and mass data can
now be pasted into the *csv file - if you so desire!
Summary:-
Other than a few minor niggles and only the one (easy to get around) "bug", that I could find,
it's getting there, but most importantly :- its usable.
John B
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.