On 06/17/2011 05:55 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
On 6/17/2011 5:12 PM, planas wrote:The current problem is we do not have any good information of what features are not very important and do not extend the functionality for all but a few users. The question is what mix of included and extensible features should be available beyond those that are important. One of the problems is you need either a lot different users surveyed at the same time or smaller number surveyed over a longer period of time. For example, most of the time I do not use a table of contents in my documents but when I need the feature I must have it. How many people need this feature irregularly versus those that often use it? I do not know.this reminds be of a conversation I had with Microsoft people back in 2000. I'm disabled, I use speech recognition and quite
I have a speech problem [Dyslexia and 3 strokes] that MS's software could not be trained to recognize properly. So I know what it is like to need good options for the disabled user. My neighbor has M.S. and her hands can barely control a mouse, let alone type on a keyboard. I was told that Dragon Speak[?] is the best of the Windows software but it needs fast systems and good resources to work properly. I was told that it should work with LibreOffice.
frankly liberated office is not terribly speech recognition friendly (including its name). The conversation I was having with Microsoft was about speech enabling Microsoft Word. They kept coming up with these really huge unmanageable grammars to try and make every GUI elements accessible. I said "but I only use 10% of word" to which they replied "so does everybody else. The problem is they all use a different 10%"Grammar issues and words that sound similar to the software - ant/aunt Ann/an/and is one of my problems with Speech software, even with a lot of training of the software.I don't know if it's comfort to know that you're suffering from the same problems as Microsoft Word and there really isn't a very good way to solve the problem.What I do in a speech interface is I try very hard to isolate grammars based on context and maybe that's the kind of thing you need to do. Yes, you will have cases where you have two ways of saying the same thing in two different contexts but it can't be helped.and for what it's worth, to do good speech user interface (i.e. not something nuance gives you), it's becoming apparent to me that you need a backdoor interface giving read/write access to all GUI/plug-in accessible data. Then the speech user interface can present the information and operations in a UI appropriate context.
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted