Sorry, but that example was the only one I remember seeing that was too
weird to forget.
I know many "high-end" users that need those limited user functions to
do really "weird" things that I would not have though possible in Word
or Excel. Those users are the type that could write books on the least
know functions of those packages and tell you why you cannot live
without using them.
What the "average" user, either business or home, needs from an office
suite is what LibreOffice gives then very well. The more complex you
make your documents with more complex functions and formulas for
spreadsheets, the harder it is to use a package. It may be even harder
to write those options for the packages than to use them.
It is nice to have one package that will open up the different modules
like word processing and spread sheets. Having to install complete
packages for each carries a lot of duplication of code and much more
file space on a hard drive. But I really do not want my word processor
to do high end spread sheet work or image editing. I would rather have
those functions in different packages [separate install files] or
separate modules of the unified package [like LibreOffice].
Sure, there is a need to write a package to will give the 20% user base
what they need. But sometimes MS seems to go overboard adding 100's or
even 1000's of new functions whether the user needs/wants them or not.
On 06/17/2011 10:44 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Lol, i can't believe they are advertising one of the key reasons we give to
people for walking away from MSO. Obviously every single user believes they are
in the 1% that uses too many of the advanced features and so could not possibly
walk away.
The specific example of not needing spreadsheet functionality inside the
word-processor is not great. It does explain the point but LibreOffice (and
OpenOffice) are more tightly integrated then MSO so the functionality is easier
to reach without it really being 'inside' the wrong app. At least that's the
impression i have.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: webmaster for Kracked Press Productions<webmaster@krackedpress.com>
To: "users@global.libreoffice.org"<users@global.libreoffice.org>
Sent: Fri, 17 June, 2011 15:33:52
Subject: [libreoffice-users] MSO's 80/20 rule: 80% of the people use about 20%
of the functionality.
A paragraph that points to pcmag.com's article about "100 Essential Tips for
Microsoft Office 2010" list the following "rule":
[quote]
For most of the world, Microsoft Office 2010 follows the 80/20 rule: 80% of the
people use about 20% of the functionality.
[unquote]
That 80% that is not used by the 80% of the users is what MSO advertised a few
years ago that these were the most needed options by users and were most of the
advertised "thousands of new functions added" for their next upgraded product.
I was told once that of that 80% not used, about 90% of that figured features
are used by only 1% of MSO's users. Can anyone spell B.L.O.A.T.
I hope LibreOffice never has that type of rule applied to their office suite.
The extensions solve many of the functions that are needed by the small
percentage of users. We do not need them to be installed by default. We do not
need to be able to do spreadsheet functions in a Writer document, but I was told
that Word can do that if you knew how to do it properly. That is bloat for
rarely function used concept and should not be in a wordprocessing document.
Copy/Paste a spreadsheet into a Writer document is OK, but we do not need to
bring all of Calc's function over to Writer so you can user Writer for Calc
work.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.