Hi :)
People do seem to have had a LOT of strange quirkiness from the 3.4.0 that
wasn't in the 3.3.2.
The 3.4.0 seems to be a regression and sounds more like a beta-release
especially with the disclaimer. However i don't see this as a huge problem
because the 3.4.0 is clearly a stepping-stone on the way to very much
lighter-weight code-base and we can expect the 3.4.1 to have tidied up trivial
issues. "You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs". I like the idea of
the 3.3.x being stable branch and the 3.4.x being testing/development.
If we can encourage people to use the 3.4.x series, post bug-reports and then
switch back to the 3.3.x series for serious use then we have something very
useful as long as we promote the 3.3.x series as being the first one to try in
corporate deployments.
Regards from
Tom :)
----- Original Message ----
From: Steve Edmonds <steve.edmonds@ptglobal.com>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Sat, 11 June, 2011 5:58:50
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] helping Users and LibreOffice - proposal
On 11/06/11 16:12, planas wrote:
Cor
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:18 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi all,
Apparently we find ourselves in an interesting situation. With the 3.4.0
release, there are obviously more questions, people stumbling over bugs.
- So to help the users, it is useful to point them to the fact that
there is a stable 3.3.2 (3.3.3 soon) that they can use with more comfort.
- However ... it is both valuable for the project, when the all do
some work with the 'early adopter' versions.
So, I would propose that the regular helping hands on this list, try to
allow for both interests. Apart from the mentioned arguments, it may as
well be appealing for quite some people to, to try working with relative
new features etc etc.
What do you think, would it be possible and useful (of course depending
on the individual mail) to pay attention to both aspects?
That would obviously result in an attitude in which people are not only
pushed back from the 3.4.0 to an older version, nor withhold explanation
about the choice they have to work with one or another.. Well, each can
find his own short or long sentences to explain :-)
some related links:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/05/13/announcing-a-new-beta-release/
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Adapt-o-meter.png
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
I have noticed that 3.4.0 seems to support 2010 docx and xlsx formats better
than 3.3.2. I have not had any major issues with 3.4.0, quirky one issue in
Calc but not a show stopper.
I have 3.4.0 on my laptop trialing it, then to filter to the desktop at
home with 3.3.2 and finally to the office with the most stable version.
I am happy to answer to any version I am using, I think if the person
asking the question is clear what version he is using the answers will
be appropriate.
steve
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.