RE: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

Thanks.
I do have a way to specify these messages as JUNK, and not even open them, BUT, they are still 
downloaded before being rejected as junk, so I get all this garbage going thru my system before the 
being dumped into the trash. $*#@*&*
You get the idea.
Thanks for your input, Roland.
Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Hughes [mailto:roland@logikalsolutions.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:23 PM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken

Richard,

If actual IT professionals set up the server correctly, you send a
COMPLETELY EMPTY MESSAGE to users+help@libreoffice.org

No SIG files, no subject, no message body.

Given the organization of the Web site, and those genetic miss-fits from
management that hang out here and speak directly out their rectal
orifice without even the tiniest shred of knowledge...I would not be
surprised to find out that doesn't work either.

Management = genetic miss-fits promoted to their level of inability.

Of course, you email system ought to provide a Web interface.  Open your
browser without your email client being opened and go to that Web page.
Find messages from 

Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>

and flag them as junk mail.  Do this on the server via the Web interface
and it will stop gigs of useless bits from attempting to come down your
dial up connection.




On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 13:31 -0400, Richard wrote:

> HELP!!!!!!!!!!!
> I am receiving 20 and more emails daily. I have tried many, many times to unsubscribe with NO 
> SUCCESS.
> PLEASE give me an email, land line, snail mail address, or phone number where I can UNSUBSCRIBE.
>
> richard@hornick.us
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joep L. Blom [mailto:jlblom@neuroweave.nl] 
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:19 AM
> To: users@libreoffice.org
> Cc: Roland Hughes
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken
>
> On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote:
> > Joep,
> >
> > Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because
> > when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a
> > whole lot of trouble for doing it.
> >
> > Now, people who once got paid for writing a program or use Microsoft
> > products may well have different opinions  since their not the ones
> > working on multi-million dollar projects for Fortunate 500 companies.
> >
> > There is a long drawn out history of people deleting what they didn't
> > read then denying things were said.
> >
> > Bottom posting wastes vast quantities of developers time scrolling to
> > the end.  Full quoting is a policy mandated by most major corporations
> > and IT organizations because it allows management (and the legal team)
> > to jump into the conversation at any point.
> >
> > I wouldn't even be on this list had the Web site been designed by
> > software professionals instead of whoever was used.
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 12:05 +0200, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> >
> > > On 30/05/11 08:45, Roland Hughes wrote:
> > > > Neither bottom nor interleaved posting methods are used by professional
> > > > IT workers.  Microsoft developers yes, but not professionals.
> > >
> > > Sigh! Roland your remark is utter nonsens. Many lists courteously
> > > request to bottom post but also request clipping. Professional IT
> > > workers remove unnecessary wording from replies and adhere to
> > > courteously requested rules.
> > > Joep
> Roland,
> Permit me to disagree. If you need E-mails for court representation it 
> is best to furnish the original E-mails not the parts of text in answers 
> to E-mails. You answer the relevant portions of an E-mail as the 
> originator has the original text. I don't think a court will accept the 
> umptieth repeat of an original E-mail. But I live in the Netherlands and 
> I have no idea how convoluted American lawyers and justices actually 
> reason. Well, that goes for Dutch members of that kind also. It is a 
> breed that I, as a simple scientist, not understand so therefore your 
> reasoning might be right.
> Joep
>
>
> -- 
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net

No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol
reserves.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted