Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


HELP!!!!!!!!!!!
I am receiving 20 and more emails daily. I have tried many, many times to
unsubscribe with NO SUCCESS.
PLEASE give me an email, land line, snail mail address, or phone number
where I can UNSUBSCRIBE.

richard@hornick.us


-----Original Message-----
From: Gianluca Turconi [mailto:public@letturefantastiche.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 8:38 AM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Trivia Question - Further Observation

Hello Alex,

In data 30 maggio 2011 alle ore 11:41:51, Alexander Thurgood  
<alex.thurgood@gmail.com> ha scritto:

Ultimately, it is not merely the remarks that Michael made, that I may,
or may not, have misinterpreted. As I mentioned, it transpires from
other mailing lists, the dev irc channel, the bug reports, the decisions
to consider any given bug as a stopper or not.

I've lurked this specific argument in the dev/steering discuss/French  
mailing lists when you were commenting Meeks's statement.

Now, I'm working with other people on this project:

http://www.mail-archive.com/projects@libreoffice.org/msg00241.html

During a lengthy and indeed very interesting discussion with Italo  
Vignoli, Andrea Pescetti and others in the Italian discuss mailing list  
(for people who knows Italian:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@it.libreoffice.org/msg00104.html ) , I  
finally wondered: will the relashionship between the Community LibO  
*product* and the commercially supported ones (Novell/Canonical/Red  
Hat/put-here-your-preferred-corporation) be like the relationship between  
Fedora Project Linux, a cutting edge and less stable version of Red Hat  
Enterprise Linux, a very solid and corporate oriented linux distribution  
based on Fedora?

I haven't a sure answer yet, but Andrea Pescetti pointed me to these Meeks  
messages:

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-May/011424.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-April/011153.html

and to the extremely important "Breathing Master" discussion here:

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-May/thread.html

Those comments and discussions + yours + the relatively scarce news I know  
about the LibO/TDF new business model based on paid certification for  
support corporation, let me think that a Community Libo "cutting edge"  
product is here to stay and may be a part of that business model.

Well, *if* it's so, I'm simply not happy of such solution. It creates a  
viable open ecosystem around LibO, for sure, but undermines the proverbial  
rock solid stability I always experienced in OOo.

Just my 2 eurocents, of course. ;-)

Regards,

Gianluca
-- 
Lettura gratuita o acquisto di libri e racconti di fantascienza, fantasy,  
horror, noir, narrativa fantastica e tradizionale:  
http://www.letturefantastiche.com/

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.