On 05/30/2011 08:38 AM, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Hello Alex,
In data 30 maggio 2011 alle ore 11:41:51, Alexander Thurgood
<alex.thurgood@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Ultimately, it is not merely the remarks that Michael made, that I may,
or may not, have misinterpreted. As I mentioned, it transpires from
other mailing lists, the dev irc channel, the bug reports, the
decisions
to consider any given bug as a stopper or not.
I've lurked this specific argument in the dev/steering discuss/French
mailing lists when you were commenting Meeks's statement.
Now, I'm working with other people on this project:
http://www.mail-archive.com/projects@libreoffice.org/msg00241.html
During a lengthy and indeed very interesting discussion with Italo
Vignoli, Andrea Pescetti and others in the Italian discuss mailing
list (for people who knows Italian:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@it.libreoffice.org/msg00104.html
) , I finally wondered: will the relashionship between the Community
LibO *product* and the commercially supported ones
(Novell/Canonical/Red Hat/put-here-your-preferred-corporation) be
like the relationship between Fedora Project Linux, a cutting edge
and less stable version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, a very solid and
corporate oriented linux distribution based on Fedora?
I haven't a sure answer yet, but Andrea Pescetti pointed me to these
Meeks messages:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-May/011424.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-April/011153.html
and to the extremely important "Breathing Master" discussion here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-May/thread.html
Those comments and discussions + yours + the relatively scarce news I
know about the LibO/TDF new business model based on paid
certification for support corporation, let me think that a Community
Libo "cutting edge" product is here to stay and may be a part of that
business model.
Well, *if* it's so, I'm simply not happy of such solution. It creates
a viable open ecosystem around LibO, for sure, but undermines the
proverbial rock solid stability I always experienced in OOo.
Just my 2 eurocents, of course. ;-)
Regards,
Gianluca
I am no longer a programmer, but as a former business programmer:
Make ALL functions work as advertised!
I had to make every option work properly and "exactly" like it was
wanted, or I get "bad news" from my bosses.
I even had to do such exact validation of input, I had to figure out
every possible value that would be used as input for the entered
fields. That is easy for things like date and time but not so easy
with number values. But I was expected to have it completely working
the first time it is use and every time it is used.
So we need to have a very stable package, and then need to have a
cutting edge package off that, for those users who want to choose.
The issues with Impress that have been reported in the lists make me
wonder about what is in the package that makes it work sometimes and
not on others. Those type of on/off issues are hard to predict and
test for. I know that there are people out there scratching their
heads trying to figure out what is the problem area of the code that
need to be fixed. But it will be fixed in due course.
I have not tried RC2, but I am told there are a lot of fixes and new
stuff in that version. As a "cutting edge" product, we keep adding
new and better features the product. As a "stable" product, people
keep fixing the issues till everything that can be fixed is fixed
"before" the new options are added. Most business models, that do not
deal with money or critical data, tend to be somewhere in the middle
between those two product development "styles".
As an Open Source software package, any business development team can
do their own work to fix issues that come up with their use of the
package. What I would like to see is a dialog between those business
people and the people who are working on LibreOffice for TDF/LO. This
would need to be a two way dialog that lets TDF know what issues are
out there and what they have done [or want done], and then have TDF
people respond about what is being done on their end. That way if
there is a fix already made, the business people could get the revised
code or maybe a compiled package with those issues fixed.
TDF/LO needs to be a part of the process so no matter how fixes the
code, all users will benefit from those fixes. Also, with the
constructive dialog between business development teams and TDF/LO
development teams, it would be better in the long run for keeping good
opinions about LibreOffice by the corporate/ business users.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.