Dňa 22.04.2011 23:44, Wayne Borean wrote / napísal(a):
What file?
Send copy as attachment.
It looks like that all tests, presented at
http://www.officeshots.org/galleries, fail because of a single issue. It
can be seen also in the attached file a. odf. This is the log from
http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/:
Result for a.odt
This file is NOT valid
Result details:
upload:///a.odt:Info:ODF Version: 1.2
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Thumbnails/' is not a sub-document and
should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package 'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/images/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/accelerator/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/progressbar/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/toolbar/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/menubar/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/toolpanel/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/popupmenu/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/statusbar/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/floater/' is not a
sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Warning:The directory 'Configurations2/images/Bitmaps/' is
not a sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package
'upload:///a.odt'!
internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-manifest-schema.rng:Info:parsed.
*upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element "manifest:manifest" is missing "version"
attribute
upload:///a.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml:Info:1 errors, 11 warnings*
upload:///a.odt/mimetype:Info:no errors, no warnings
upload:///a.odt:Info:Media Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-schema.rng:Info:parsed.
upload:///a.odt/meta.xml:Info:Generator: LibreOffice/3.3$Unix LibreOffice_project/330m19$Build-202
upload:///a.odt/meta.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
upload:///a.odt/settings.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
upload:///a.odt/styles.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
upload:///a.odt/content.xml:Info:no errors, no warnings
internal:schema/odf12/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-rev02-dsig-schema.rng:Info:parsed.
upload:///a.odt:Info:1 errors, 11 warnings
I guess that by correcting this, the majority of tests from
http://www.officeshots.org/galleries will pass.
The other attached file has also two other problems:
upload:///DoplnenieSOIT-april2011.odt/styles.xml[2,6435]:Error:attribute
"style:text-combine-start-char" has a bad value: the length of the value is 0, but the required
length is 1.
upload:///DoplnenieSOIT-april2011.odt/styles.xml[2,6963]:Error:attribute
"fo:hyphenation-remain-char-count" has a bad value: "0" does not satisfy the "positiveInteger" type
Is it possible that the files are OK but the validator is incorrect?
Milos
Wayne
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Milos Sramek <sramek.milos@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
I want to point to a problem regarding validity of the ODF documents
produced by LO.
The http://www.officeshots.org/galleries web page offers numerous test
files for validity checking - it looks like the worst results are
obtained by LO (no single valid file), while other programs passed all
(abiword) or nearly all (MSOffice) tests.
I verified that also by sending a random file to
http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/: A file produced by LO
resulted in many times more errors than a file created by MSOffice2010.
Perhaps these are not big bugs - but may become a a BIG argument against
using LO in, say public administration.
What do you think about that?
Thanks
Milos
--
email & jabber: sramek.milos@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
email & jabber: sramek.milos@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.