Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: ODF format validity

Il 24/04/2011 20:04, NoOp ha scritto:
> On 04/24/2011 01:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> > Le 23/04/2011 11:00, Milos Sramek a écrit :
> > > Dňa 22.04.2011 23:44, Wayne Borean  wrote / napísal(a):
> > > > What file?
> > > >
> > > > Send copy as attachment.
> > > It looks like that all tests, presented at
> > > http://www.officeshots.org/galleries, fail because of a single issue. It
> > > can be seen also in the attached file a. odf. This is the log from
> > > http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/:
> > >
> > >
> > >      Result for a.odt
> > >
> > > This file is NOT valid
> > >
> > > Result details:
> > >
> > > upload:///a.odt:Info:ODF Version: 1.2
> >
> > Perhaps the problem is there : change default ODF version used by your
> > LibreOffice and try again.
> > Menu Tools>  Options>  Load/Save>  General
>
> I ran a few tests as well at http://tools.odftoolkit.org/odfvalidator/
> I created a single document with LO 3.3.2, Ubuntu OOo 3.2, Standard OOo
> 3.3.0, and Standard OOo-Dev (3.4.0). All failed with 1.2 extended with
> the exception of OOo-Dev (3.4.0).
>
> With OOo-Dev 3.4.0:
> ODF Validator Result Page
> Result for OOoDev34_odftTest.odt
>
> This file is valid
>
> Errors whith LO 3.3.2, Ubuntu OOo 3.2, and Standard OOo 3.3.0, were
> consistent 'Error:element "manifest:manifest" is missing "version"
> attribute':
>
> upload:///LO332_odfTest.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element
> "manifest:manifest" is missing "version" attribute
> upload:///LO332_odfTest.odt:Info:Generator: LibreOffice/3.3$Linux
> LibreOffice_project/330m19$Build-202
> Result details:
>
> upload:///SOOo330_odfTest.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element
> "manifest:manifest" is missing "version" attribute
> upload:///SOOo330_odfTest.odt:Info:Generator: OpenOffice.org/3.3$Linux
> OpenOffice.org_project/330m20$Build-9567
>
> When changing the format to 1.0/1.1:
> ODF Validator Result Page
> Result for LO332_odfTest_ODF1.odt
>
> This file is valid
>
> and
>
> ODF Validator Result Page
> Result for SOOo330_odfTest_ODF1.odt
>
> This file is valid
> ====
>
> Note:
>
> 1.2 (not extended) fails on all as well - with the exception of OOo-Dev
> (3.4.0). Also, I first tested a Word97 document that I'd used in a bug
> report (saved as odt) and that doc carries over a style that the odf
> test doesn't like:
> upload:///Word97Test_wLO.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml[2,88]:Error:element
> "manifest:manifest" is missing "version" attribute
> upload:///Word97Test_wLO.odt/styles.xml[2,12196]:Error:unexpected
> attribute "style:layout-grid-snap-to-characters"
> upload:///Word97Test_wLO.odt:Info:Generator: LibreOffice/3.3$Linux
> LibreOffice_project/330m19$Build-202
>
> This file is NOT valid
>
> Result details:
>
> upload:///Word97Test_OOoDev.odt/styles.xml[2,12124]:Error:unexpected
> attribute "style:layout-grid-snap-to-characters"
> upload:///Word97Test_OOoDev.odt:Info:Generator: OOo-dev/3.4$Linux
> OpenOffice.org_project/340m0$Build-9583
>
> so I recommend testing using just a cleanly generated file (like I did
> afterwards) for the tests.

Very interesting results... we have to deal with them as soon as possible...

If Libò 3.4.0 will be merged again with the last OOo 3.4.0 commits 
without loosing all the code cleaning (Code Hacks) efforts we could have 
the same "The file is valid" also for Libò 3.4.0.

Happy Easter evening,

Carlo

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted