Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Ellison's Oracle washes hands of OpenOffice

On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:41 -0400, Wayne Borean wrote: 

> In that case, you can see where I'm leading the conversation, and why my
> concept of 'Free Software Darwinism' could be really important to us, and
> scary as hell to Microsoft.
>
> Wayne
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, plino <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > @Wayne
> >
> > Being a biologist, I find your Evolution parallel quite interesting.
> >
> > Answering your previous question: of course IBM has it's own flavour of
> > Office (based on OpenOffice in fact):  it's called IBM Lotus Symphony
> > http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/products
> >
> > Enjoy! ;)
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ellison-s-Oracle-washes-hands-of-OpenOffice-tp2826546p2832723.html
> > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
> > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
> > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> > deleted

Wayne

I would think some the hardware vendors would promote FOSS more. They
can benefit from the hardware sales. I can see why MS hates FOSS, they
are almost a pure software vendor and FOSS hurts their sales.
-- 
Jay Lozier
Jslozier@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted