Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index

+1 to what Uwe and Michael and Telesto have been saying.

Personal / Community are not accurate labels because they imply missing features. LibreOffice as we currently know it is full featured. By introducing these labels, you are signaling an intent to "dumb down" LibreOffice.

The current real distinction is around support.  So, using Linux terminology, a more accurate label would be LibreOffice Rolling verses LibreOffice LTS.  But that is geeky terminology, so for that reason it probably isn't appropriate.

Therefore since none of the suggested labels properly convey meaning, I too prefer the supposedly unavailable "no label" solution for TDF builds.


On 10/21/20 11:52 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote:

Am 20.10.20 um 10:50 schrieb Michael Weghorn:

If "no label is not an option" (as stated by Italo), I'd currently
prefer something like "TDF Edition" over "Personal Edition" or
"Community Edition" as well, given the negative/misleading connotations
the latter may result in.
"no label is not an option" is Italos and some others - professional as I have to admit - option. But 
"no label" also still is an option - no decision made yet.

And imho no label is the preferred option (as stated in past).
Uwe Altmann

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.