On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:
When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that
people "need" proprietary MS formats to be efficient.
In one sense, MS is being "truthful". There is a huge ecosystem built
around Microsoft's file formats: CRM, ERP, and similar software.
However, there is nothing preventing the companies that create that
software from also supportingt ODF in their products. (NOTE: I am
assuming that Microsoft has not forced those vendors to sign
contracts that prohibit them supporting non-Microsoft file formats.
Given Microsoft's history, such a prospect is possible.)
A second datapoint is that the major a11y vendors do not include
support for FLOSS in the offerings. (Two of the biggest vendors have
flat out promised that their software will never work correctly with
FLOSS program.)
I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the European
market to FOSS and open standards/formats.
Microsoft's issue with Europe is that unlike BRICS, bribes are more
likely to have the company put into goal, than achieve the desired
outcome.
governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA.
Any government that relies on any software produced by a foreign
firm, is a government that is subjecting itself to known security
flaws.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.