On 2/14/13 1:03 AM, C. Olofson wrote:
I can't speak to licensing terms but with respect to adoption of
anything other than MSO: in my (limited) experience with both companies
and non-profits, most resistance to moving away from MSO comes from the
workers who use MSO.
Resistance to change from users is definitely the bigger barrier to
migrations, and this is why a migration project should be more focused
on breaking this barrier than selling any feature. I would say that the
problem is 80% psycological and 20% technical.
That attitude, in my opinion, is the biggest barrier to LibO adoption;
even bigger than MS' fud machine.
Microsoft is working at different levels: FUD on decision makers (with
feature comparison, scaring statements on licenses, pressure and lobby,
and so on) and lock in features on end users (the ribbon and C-Fonts are
lock in features).
Microsoft largest expense on Office is the communication budget, which
is way bigger than the development budget.
--
Italo Vignoli - italo.vignoli@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316436@messagenet.it
skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vignoli@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Enterprise adoption of LibreOffice (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.