Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


This has nothing to do with agreement, but with evidence.  I did not ask
for a change of course.  I asked how the group decided it was competent to
judge others.

Second, from people in the bsd community, I have data that it costs close
to six figures to implement a cbt with the capable vendors.

Your nonresponsiveness about whose interest is furthered by this course of
action is disturbing.   Developers, writers, and testers who might
contribute now have to deal with self appointed third parties who use the
work, but will now imply people who don't pay up for a piece of paper, are
incompetent.

So whose interest does the project serve - developers or buyers?
On Apr 26, 2012 9:33 PM, "Italo Vignoli" <italo.vignoli@gmail.com> wrote:

Robert Ryley wrote:

So, you have no answers to any of my observations, but feel
"competent" to declare that "certification"
will solve the problem?

It looks like you have already decided that we are wrong, as you are
going on with your assumptions. I have already answered, but it looks
like you consider my answer as wrong because they are not in line with
your thinking.

Again, you are free to think that we are wrong, and I am free to think
that you are wrong. Sometimes, you do not want to discuss when you feel
that there is nothing to discuss.

We are not going to change our course of action because you show up and
decide that this is not the right course of action. We have discussed it
in public: the program is online since August 2011.

We are answering a request of some of our members, both developers and
non developers, who are happy about the solution and are ready to
support the program.

We appreciate the fact that there might be people who do not agree with
our vision, but we know that we will never get to a global consensus.

This is my last message on the subject.

--
Italo Vignoli - italo.vignoli@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316436@messagenet.it
skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vignoli@gmail.com

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.