On 11/19/2011 07:48 AM, Harri Pitkänen wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if it is appropriate to mention on our localized web sites or
somewhere else any upcoming LibreOffice courses in local community colleges.
In Finland the community college system is partially state funded and the
actual colleges are usually operated either by local municipalities, non-
profit organizations or in some cases for-profit groups. They are open to
everyone and classes are usually held during evenings and weekends, allowing
even those who have regular jobs to participate. The subjects range from
computer skills to archeology and pottery making.
During the past years Finnish community colleges have been quite active at
offering basic computer skill courses using OpenOffice.org. I believe this has
been good marketing for OOo, especially among the elderly people who quite
often learn their computer skills on such courses. Now I see that some
community colleges here have switched to LibreOffice which is of course great.
There are participation fees to these courses but thanks to government funding
they are often relatively low. One community college is offering a 12 hour
LibreOffice course with 120 euro fee in April 2012. Another just finished a
combined OOo/LibreOffice course, 12 hours with 35 euro fee.
I know that there is a certification program coming and this kind of activity
would most likely fall within it. But these community colleges could have hard
time finding resources to participate in the certification programs at the
same level as typical IT training companies since the companies collect much
higher participation fees (typically around 1000 euros for courses with
similar length). Community colleges often do not even have permanent teaching
staff for their courses but just contract someone who happens to be available
and has the sufficient skills.
Should we take the difference in business models in account when we set up the
rules for the training certification program? Or should we just exclude
community colleges from the certification program and assume that the
government supervision is enough to guarantee sufficient quality?
Harri
Here is my thought.
A certification "course" should/could be using some type of step by step
training guide. Each section of that "guide" must be completed
successfully before you can go on to the next section. Once you
completed all the sections, you are given an exam. Completing the
course and getting the required score on the exam should/could be the
requirement for the certification.
I needed to fill in some credits in college one semester and took a
three part course. Part One was basic computer skills. Part Two was
skills using Word. Part Three was skills using Excel. The LO
certification would take each Module as a different section, or part,
and deal with all the needed skills that the certification developers
feel that is needed for "proper" use/skills for LO. I took a
certification course in CISCO networks and they used a combination
workbook and computer [online] based training and browser based
testing. Then after you completed the course, you went to a testing
place for certifications that was held twice a year. The exam was a
flat fee, while each course at a college or training center had their
own fee structure. That way you could either take the course with an
instructor, or do it on your own. Then twice a year, the certification
exam was held for every one.
That type of course and exam structure seems to work for many different
certifications. Or, it did when I was preparing to take some of these
certifications.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.