Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 6/30/11 1:15 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Yes, the meeting happened but decisions lack gravitas due to the low number of
people involved.  In small new(ish) (within the last 20 years) co-operatives the
ideal work-around is for the next meeting to vote on accepting the minutes and
separately vote on accepting the decisions made.

The meeting was just a conversation, and there wasn't any decision involved in that conversation. So, repeating the meeting is OK, as this will allow everyone to participate to the conversation, but if we cover the same topics there won't be any decision taken even during the new meeting (unless there are net topics on the table).

If the issue is the certification project, it has been stated several times that decisions about this project will be postponed until the end of August or even early September, as we would like to collect as many opinions as possible.

Italo Vignoli
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.