Le 2011-04-25 08:06, drew a écrit :
For myself I'm trying to set a good example, but if that is being taken
as a sign of my agreement that this one team has final say in all work
product then let me assuage you of that misconception without further
If the person(s) working on a particular item wants to put their work up
for review, I would encourage them to do so, voluntarily.
Yes, however, if following the meritocratic style of the LibreOffice
project, you have, in my most honest opinion, merit to do this. You have
a proven track record of working within the confines of the agreed
guidelines and you have proven yourself, clearly, as an asset to the
project. Having any kind of vetting process is to make sure that people,
who have not as yet merit with the project, have a validation process to
give merit to the their work. Nothing wrong with voluntarily passing
items for review, but I would imagine, that if these people have not as
yet reached merit within the group, that a validation process should be
followed. I happen to like the process under which we are working at
As far as the text in the material, in this particular case ...
marketing material, the marketing team would give approval for the text
included in document/materials. Marketing text is not the area of
expertise of the design team.
It goes without saying that in both these cases the TDF membership is
involved through their participation in these groups giving validity to
the approval process of both groups.
So, in this particular case, dealing with the 3rd party icons, it would
seem to me, the design team should be given mandate of assuring the
proper usage of these icons
On this one point - yes I agree.
This was the point in putting up a temporary warning note on the wiki
page until we sort out the licensing stipulations. We need to either
find a way to conform or, as you suggested, contact them and try to
negotiate a more friendly use of their icon set if possible. I agree
that someone from the TDF should be involved in negotiating this.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Third Party Logs wiki page · Tom Davies
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy