On 04/24/2011 01:13 PM, Riemer Thalen wrote:
- Three times I tried to introduce OOo in organisations I that hired me.
Three times I failed. Reason number one: OOo/LibO lacks "normal view" and/or
"hide white space". Many people within the companies found scrolling
through upper and lower margins so annoying they did not want to use OOo.
There are many examples like this one, of user requests which have been
ignored for years by OOo developers. We are trying to fix the process
but it takes time.
- Calc was not adopted because some things work differently from MSO. A
litte "switcher's guide" could have prevented the rejection. That is: if you
care enough about your potential customers to find out what bothers them and
accept that maybe - just maybe - you don't know everything that matters.
Calc vs Excel is another area where there are many information, but
sometimes features are difficult to implement. Developers are working at
a new engine, which should solve many problems and improve speed of
What I wanted to stress is that we already have many feedback from
potential users (we don't have customers), but not on the marketing
mailing list (which is supposed to cover promotion).
Of course, we will never know enough.
- Students dropped OOo for another reason. Documents they composed in OOo
and saved as doc-files at home, were not printed in the proper layout
using the university Windows/MSO computers. Maybe their settings were wrong,
maybe they made stupid mistakes, but they had a very quick solution: they
dropped OOo and were very vocal about it.
This is usually independent from software (the problem exists either way
you see it: MS Office > OOo and OOo > MS Office)), and is connected to
configuration, printers and fonts. The solution (using the same font on
every PC, configuring the same printer on every PC, and so on) is easily
available, but people keeps blaming the software.
If these guys had written on the user@ mailing list, they would have
received the answer in a matter of minutes. We have placed articles on
this specific problem, but people do not read (well, some do).
Some time ago, Ubuntu/Canonical ran a "100 paper cuts" campaign. Users could
report little things that annoyed them and could be fixed easily. I think
LibO should follow that example (apart from the former users survey).
This would indeed be a good idea, but we have not enough bandwidth to
implement it. We are volunteers, and make use of our spare time to work
for TDF. Each one of us manages his own agenda and priorities.
If this is a high priority for you, you are welcome to step in and
contribute. Each one of us has already enough high priority activities
to perform, and can't add another one.
Best regards, Italo
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Fwd: [libreoffice-marketing] BrOffice product and community will be called LibreOffice · Andrea Pescetti
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] BrOffice product and community will be called LibreOffice (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy