On 03/04/2011 01:36 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-03-04 11:41, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
But back to the Accessibility issue. It would be nice to be known as an
organization the cares about the needs of better accessibility for
software packages. Though it is a small market group, it seems to be
good press. And the more good press LibreOffice gets, the better it is,
Right?
I am not sure about different jurisdictions or countries, but in some,
to be considered for institutional installation, the software must
comply to certain accessibility rules/laws. I believe the
accessibility aspect of LibreOffice is not really a choice it is part
of being accepted as a serious contender in the office suite arena.
Microsoft Office relies on Windows to do everything for accessibility.
Linux and MacOSX has built in or add on accessibility options external
to the software packages. I tried to get a Windows machine to work for
a lady that needed very large fonts and such so she can read. I know a
doctor that uses a special magnifying device to read his 30 inch
computer screen to use the medical office's required MS based system.
If we can tell people that we are easier to set up the accessibility
options that what it takes to get MSO to work, that would be a big win
for the agencies that need such accessibility for their clients. At
least have GOOD documents helping get all the currently available
accessibility options working for our users needs. That is much more
that MS offers for their systems, the last time I looked for such
documentation. The more that LibreOffice proves they care about their
users, unlike the 600 pound gorilla company who proves they do not care
about the users except for heir money. Just that one point, we care
about our users office suite needs and wants, will make LibreOffice a
better option than MS is. Accessibility is just part of that "we care"
statement.
And yes, we should be putting in advertising/marketing any aspect that
the LibreOffice suite fills now and sometimes a hint of things to
come, as you suggest, would perhaps be better enticement for
governments to consider adopting the suite for their institutions.
Now that the White House [i.e. USA Government] supports Open Source,
that might help with the USA market. The UK government seems to support
open source as well. Now we just need "them" to support LibreOffice by
name.
Thanks for the reminder.
Cheers
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: help please - accessibility info (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-marketing] help please - accessibility info · Bernhard Dippold
[libreoffice-marketing] Re: help please - accessibility info · Marc Paré
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.