Hi :)
I saw Fabien run into this problem too = 10hours work for something he should
have been able to just grab from the wiki-website in less than 10mins! In the
absence of anything easy to reach on the wiki and the fast pace of development
we can't all always stay completely informed or up-to-date about all aspects.
As a first step i think we need to get the selection of cd/dvd labels and logos
up on the wiki website within easy reach of everyone.
Then the appropriate teams can work at making sure the selection gets sifted or
tweaked into compliance and that the rules/guidelines are there for people to
read easily.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Dave Johnson <davefilms.us@gmail.com>
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Mon, 31 January, 2011 13:47:28
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] DVD label
FYI I used the early 'official' logos that are provided on the wiki. I am
getting tired of the rude objections toi juste about everything It do. It is
the viger font!
Dave Johnson
On Jan 31, 2011 4:43 AM, "Dr. Bernhard Dippold" <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
wrote:
Hi Stefan, Dave, all,
Thanks for pointing to the important basics for any LibO related artwork!
Hi Dave,
Am 30.01.2011 23:02, schrieb Dave Johnson:
Here is the label for my local ar...
This case is quite special because Dave mimics the original logo
by putting together the single parts of the logo (symbol and text),
whiole using them alone is allowed following the Guidelines.
What needs consideration is:
- Don't reduce the white space area around the logo to less than
1/2 the width of the symbol.
The "SM" sign is just 1/4 of the symbol's width away from the
LibreOffice text.
When the right distances are respected, the impression of a
modified logo will be reduced, as the distance allows a clear
distiction between our logo and the surroundings.
- Don't modify the logo colors.
The lower border of the symbol is covered by some kind of
grey painting - perhaps this derives from removing the gradient
in front of the logo.
Either use the contemporary logo if you want to show gradients
or use the default logo, if the symbol sould stay black.
Also see the Trademark Policy
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TradeMark_Policy
Following our latest discussions with Dave, I'm quite sure
he is informed about it - especially with regards to the
differentiation between external reference to the product and
community on the one hand and representation as TDF /
community spokespeople / official provider of resources
on the other.
Very soon there will be a modified logo to be used for
external reference - probably based on this draft:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Non-TDF_logos.png
So please stay tuned...
Best regards
Bernhard
PS: Personally I don't think that the colors of the blue gradient
fit very well with the LibO green, but this is nothing we need to
discuss here...
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
marketing+help@libreoffice.org<marketing%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
List archive: http://list...
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.