Hi :)
The PC World article follows another biased and similarly inaccurate article by
the same author in November.
Note that at the bottom of the article you can vote yes or no for whether the
article "was useful" without having to register with them but to post a comment
you would need to register.
Generally i avoid registering with sites that happily post such garbage and it
upsets me that the author got paid for the article. Most people that post in
here (even the complainers) put far more work and intelligence into their posts
but none would expect any kind of payment.
The author has allegedly been writing articles in this IT hobbyist's mag and
even has written a few "best sellers". However he seems to have no idea about
the existence of xml (and possibly html) or java-script. His review is based on
installing on 2 machines both of which appear to suffer from user-error in their
basic set-up. The 2 'fancy features' in the newer MS Office seem to be avoided
in most offices i have seen lately, even the adamantly pro-MS ones.
The fact that many people will read and value such nonsense is disturbing.
Presumably the value is that it re-confirms certain people's limited world view
without them having to actually have a look for themselves. I hope we can do
without such people. Such people are one of the best reasons for moving away
from MS imo and i am glad to miss them.
To anyone with even a tiny amount of general computer knowledge the author is
clearly a fool with a paycheck. It reminds me of the Mark Twain quote in
DistroWatch "It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to
open it and remove all doubt." (Mark Twain)
However, it does get people talking about LibreOffice in the mainstream IT. Is
there any such thing as bad publicity? For example by looking up this article
and voting "No" shows the magazine that such articles are popular and encourages
them to pay for more similar nonsense.
The work that people do for LibreOffice will far out-last such nonsense as that
article.
Regards to all from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Leif Lodahl <leiflodahl@gmail.com>
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Wed, 26 January, 2011 13:33:38
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] PC world article
PCWorld is and has always been very M$ friendly. Perhaps because M$ is a
huge sponsor (adverts).
We have the same situation with a few magazines here in our region.
Cheers,
Leif Lodahl
The Danish Team
2011/1/26 Charles-H. Schulz <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
Hello,
the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the
coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent.
Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this
article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and
their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the
"outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage
to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice
in this one.
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html
l
My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this
amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but
not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss
SharePoint"..WTF?
Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a
completely wrong way).
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
marketing+help@libreoffice.org<marketing%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.