Re: [libreoffice-marketing] PC world article

You might have taken it the wrong way but i think a LOT of people here read it 
the same way as you.  Difficult to read it any other way!

The SlashDot one and the original it quotes from is trickier.  Sometimes slating 
us and sometimes praising.  A much better article entirely.

Regards from
Tom :)




________________________________
From: Charles-H. Schulz <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Wed, 26 January, 2011 13:26:18
Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] PC world article

Hello,

the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the
coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent. 

Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this
article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and
their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the
"outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage
to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice
in this one.
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html

My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this
amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but
not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss
SharePoint"..WTF?

Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a
completely wrong way). 

Best,

-- 
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


      
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***